|
Welcome back! What did you think of our Property Management Software?
Are you subscribed to our feed and receiving email updates? |
Tenant Guide Security Deposit Issue
California’s security deposit statute specifically allows the landlord to use a tenant’s security deposit for the four purposes. The statute limits the landlord’s deduction from the security deposit to an amount that is “reasonably necessary” for the listed purposes.240
Unfortunately, the statute’s terms “reasonably necessary” and “normal wear and tear” are vague and mean different things to different people. The following suggestions are offered as practical guides for dealing with security deposit issues. While these suggestions are consistent with the law, they are not necessarily the law in this area.
1. Costs of cleaning
A landlord may properly deduct from the departing tenant’s security deposit to make the rental unit as clean as it was when the tenant moved in.241
A landlord cannot routinely charge each tenant for cleaning carpets, drapes, walls, or windows in order to prepare the rental unit for the next tenancy. Instead, the landlord must look at how well the departing tenant cleaned the rental unit, and may charge cleaning costs only if the departing tenant left the rental unit (or a portion of it) less clean than when he or she moved in. Reasonable cleaning costs would include the cost of such things as eliminating flea infestations left by the tenant’s animals, cleaning the oven, removing decals from walls, removing mildew in bathrooms, defrosting the refrigerator, or washing the kitchen floor. But the landlord could not charge for cleaning any of these conditions if they existed at the time that the departing tenant moved in. In addition, the landlord could not charge for the cumulative effects of wear and tear. Suppose, for example, that the tenant had washed the kitchen floor but that it remained dingy because of wax built up over the years. The landlord could not charge the tenant for stripping the built-up wax from the kitchen floor.
The landlord is allowed to deduct from the tenant’s security deposit only the reasonable cost of cleaning the rental unit.242
2. Carpets and drapes—“useful life” rule
Normal wear and tear to carpets, drapes and other furnishings cannot be charged against a tenant’s security deposit.243 Normal wear and tear includes simple wearing down of carpet and drapes because of normal use or aging, and includes moderate dirt or spotting. In contrast, large rips or indelible stains justify a deduction from the tenant’s security deposit for repairing the carpet or drapes, or replacing them if that is reasonably necessary.
One common method of calculating the deduction for replacement prorates the total cost of replacement so that the tenant pays only for the remaining useful life of the item that the tenant has damaged or destroyed. For example, suppose a tenant has damaged beyond repair an eight-year-old carpet that had a life expectancy of ten years, and that a replacement carpet of similar quality would cost $1,000. The landlord could properly charge only $200 for the two years’ worth of life (use) that would have remained if the tenant had not damaged the carpet.
3. Repainting walls
One approach for determining the amount that the landlord can deduct from the tenant’s security deposit for repainting, when repainting is necessary, is based on the length of the tenant’s stay in the rental unit. This approach assumes that interior paint has a two-year life. (Some landlords assume that interior paint has a life of three years or more.)
Length of Stay Deduction
Less than 6 months full cost
6 months to 1 year two-thirds of cost
1 year to 2 years one-third of cost
2 or more years no deduction
Using this approach, if the tenant lived in the rental unit for two years or more, the tenant could not be charged for any repainting costs, no matter how dirty the walls were.244
4. Other damage to walls
Generally, minor marks or nicks in walls are the landlord’s responsibility as normal wear and tear (for example, worn paint caused by a sofa against the wall). Therefore, the tenant should not be charged for such marks or nicks. However, a large number of holes in the walls or ceiling that require filling with plaster, or that otherwise require patching and repainting, could justify withholding the cost of repainting from the tenant’s security deposit. In this situation, deducting for painting would be more likely to be proper if the rental unit had been painted recently, and less likely to be proper if the rental unit needed repainting anyway. Generally, large marks or paint gouges are the tenant’s responsibility.245
5. Common sense and good faith
Remember: These suggestions are not hard and fast rules. Rather, they are offered to help tenants and landlords avoid, understand, and resolve security deposit disputes.
Security deposit disputes often can be resolved, or avoided in the first place, if the parties exercise common sense and good judgment, and deal with each other fairly and in good faith. For example, a landlord should not deduct from the tenant’s security deposit for normal wear and tear, and a tenant should not try to avoid responsibility for damages that the tenant has caused.
The requirement that the landlord send the tenant copies of invoices and receipts with the itemized statement of deductions may help avoid potential security deposit disputes. Before sending these items to the tenant, the landlord has the opportunity to double check them to be sure that the amounts deducted are reasonable, accurate and reasonably necessary for a purpose specified by the security deposit statute. Before challenging the deductions, the tenant has the opportunity to review and carefully evaluate the documentation provided by the landlord. Straightforward conduct by both parties at this stage may avoid or minimize a dispute over deductions from the tenant’s security deposit.
Especially in disputes about security deposits, overreaching by one party only invites the other party to take a hard line. Disputes that reach this level often become unresolvable by the parties and wind up in court.
241 Civil Code Section 1950.5(b)(3).
242 Civil Code Section 1950.5(e).
243 Civil Code Section 1950.5(e).
244 Brown, Warner and Portman, The California Landlord’s Law Book, Vol. I: Rights & Responsibilities, pages 384-385 (NOLO Press 2009).
245 Brown, Warner and Portman, The California Landlord’s Law Book, Vol. I: Rights & Responsibilities, pages 384-385 (NOLO Press 2009).
You might also want to read:
- Landlords and Tenants in Michigan – What To Do With Security Deposit When Subleasing Landlords and tenants in Michigan – Because nothing in the original lease agreement changes when a tenant subleases to a subtenant, the original tenant’s security deposit will remain with the......
- Tenants Guide to Refund of Security Deposits The most common disagreement between landlords and tenants is over the refund of the tenant’s security deposit after the tenant has moved out of the rental unit. California law therefore......
- Tenants Guide to Security Deposits Rules At the beginning of the tenancy, the landlord most likely will require tenant to pay a security deposit. The landlord can use the security deposit, for example, if the tenant......
