California Courts Say Rents Not Collectible for Unpermitted Units

Today’s lesson of the day: “If you are renting out a unit that has not been permitted for occupancy, don’t count on being able to collect a judgment against a tenant who defaults on the rent.”
Maria Espinoza had rented a unit to two tenants, Gudelia Calva and Jorge Soqui, and after three months of not collecting the $750 monthly rent, Espinoza had them evicted. The eviction action was upheld and the landlord was awarded possession of the premises, but the tenants had raised various claims about the sub-standard conditions of the unit, including the fact that it had not been certified for occupancy.
The court ruled that the tenants had owed $3,350, but the amount was reduced by $1,000 because of the condition of the property.
For some reason, the case was appealed. The appellate court upheld the eviction, but disagreed with the first court with respect to the amount due from the tenants. The court referred to the fact that the Santa Ana municipal code prohibits the use or occupation of a building “until the building official has issued a certificate of occupancy,” and because no occupancy permit had been issued, the court held that “the occupancy was unlawful and the lease constitutes an illegal contract.” Therefore, they ruled it was incorrect for the first court to have given an award of any rent at all, and they ruled that no money was due.
Was this ruling a good thing or a bad thing? Realty Times highlights some of the unintended consequences, including a reduction in the number of affordable rental units due to the fact that there are a significant number of unpermitted rental units. Many of those units could never be permitted because of various zoning and building ordinances. Many landlords of unpermitted units will take them off the market rather than run the risk of collecting nothing in an eviction action.
This is a huge win for tenants, and this court decision certainly diminishes the appeal of being a landlord – but is it really that bad? Should landlords have been renting out units if they were not certified to be occupied in the first place? What do you think?
This blog post for Real Estate Professionals, Investors, Landlord, Property Manager, and Property Management Companies is brought to you by SimplifyEm Pay Rent Online and Property Management Software|
Welcome back! What did you think of our Property Management Software?
Are you subscribed to our feed and receiving email updates? |
You might also want to read:
- 3 Tips for Property Managers and Landlords to Maximize Rents in 2010 Economy is still struggling and rental property occupancy rates have been dropping which is resulting in decreased rental income for property owners. Follow these tips in 2010 to maximize rental income. 1. Increase Rents At present rents are under pressure but 2010 could present an opportunity for some of the......
- Reverse Mortgages Leading to Property Management There’s a new investment strategy that has become popular recently: buy a multi-unit property with an FHA reverse mortgage, live in one unit while renting out the others, and NEVER pay a dime towards your monthly principal or interest – with a reverse mortgage, of course! FHA now permits seniors......
- FHA Rules for Investors More Strict than Fannie Mae The Federal Housing Administration has released its long-awaited rules on condominium loans. On one hand, the new rules allow lenders a lot of more flexibility, but on the other hand, the agency is imposing a number of important restrictions. For beginners, FHA said it won’t insure units in condominiums where......
- Gardening Nudists vs Landlord and Neighbors A couple of nudists claim their landlord is wrongly discriminating against them by trying to get them to cover up while gardening. They were accused by their landlord of being a nuisance, because they wear only thong underwears and pasties while gardening. Neighbors complained to police about the couple’s scanty......
- Capital Gains Tax Planning | Principle Residence 1031 Exchange If you sell a multiple-unit property which includes your primary residence, the sale may qualify for a 1031 exchange, and you may be entitled to the $250,000 exclusion on capital gains. Just treat each portion of the sale as a different transaction. For example, say you sold a duplex for......


I loved going through this blog, you totally knocked it out of the ballpark! I have sent a link to my friends, and shall surely be returning back for update.
Thank you so much, there aren’t enough posts on this… or at least i cant find them. I am turning into such a blog nut, I just cant get enough and this is such an important topic… i’ll be sure to write something about your site